Florida Supreme Court Decision Says That Subsequent Treating Physician Testimony That He Would Not H
Today's MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com's blog discusses the July 10, 2014 decision of the Florida Supreme Court that testimony that a subsequent treating physician would not have treated the plaintiff differently had the defendant physician acted within the applicable standard of care is irrelevant and inadmissible and will not insulate a defendant physician from liability for his or her own negligence. Baltimore, Maryland (PRWEB) July 14, 2014 MedicalMalpracticeLawyers.com is the premier free website that connects medical malpractice victims in the United States with medical malpra
Contributor
About
PRWeb, a leader in online news and press release distribution, has been used by attorneys, law firms and more than 40,000 organizations
PRWeb, a leader in online news and press release distribution, has been used by attorneys, law firms and more than 40,000 organizations
Categories
- Articles 312
- Bankruptcy 44
- Business 134
- Cases & Codes 68
- Contracts 27
- Criminal Law 122
- Employment 24
- Expert Reports 3
- Expert Witness 34
- Family Law 57
- Form Letters 15
- Immigration 3
- Intellectual Prop 32
- Internet Law 10
- Law Practice 99
- Law School 2
- Legal Research 19
- Litigation 186
- Miscellaneous 64
- PR Web 41689
- Personal Injury 609
- Press Release 43
- Probate 54
- Real Estate 68
- Tax Law 23
- Workers Comp 4