SCOTUS Patent Ruling Has ‘Profound’ Implications for Big Data: Professor Daryl Lim at Chicago’s John
What the Supreme Court says about inventions that don’t deserve a patent holds important lessons, says intellectual property law Professor Daryl Lim of The John Marshall Law School in Chicago. (PRWEB) July 09, 2014 An “inventive” idea with tangible effects deserves a patent, but an attempt to patent abstract business ideas doesn’t meet those standards, the U.S. Supreme Court recently decided in Alice Corporation v. CLS Bank International (Docket #13-298). In its ruling, the court stressed the need to preserve a patent-free zone did not want patent owners monopolizing basic tools for scien
Contributor
About
PRWeb, a leader in online news and press release distribution, has been used by attorneys, law firms and more than 40,000 organizations
PRWeb, a leader in online news and press release distribution, has been used by attorneys, law firms and more than 40,000 organizations
Categories
- Articles 313
- Bankruptcy 44
- Business 134
- Cases & Codes 68
- Contracts 27
- Criminal Law 122
- Employment 24
- Expert Reports 3
- Expert Witness 34
- Family Law 57
- Form Letters 15
- Immigration 3
- Intellectual Prop 32
- Internet Law 10
- Law Practice 99
- Law School 2
- Legal Research 19
- Litigation 186
- Miscellaneous 64
- PR Web 41689
- Personal Injury 609
- Press Release 43
- Probate 54
- Real Estate 68
- Tax Law 23
- Workers Comp 4